Craig Montell.

Interview with Craig Montell, whose work focuses on identifying receptors, channels and sensory neurons important in vision, taste, and temperature sensation.

Reflections on Integrins-Past, Present, and Future: The Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award.

This Viewpoint discusses the rapid advances in molecular cell biological approaches over the past 50 years and the many avenues for future advances that have been opened, including direct applications for therapeutic and regenerative medicine.

In conversation with Christine Watson.

Christine J. Watson is Professor of Cell and Cancer Biology at the University of Cambridge. Christine obtained her Bachelor's (honors) degree in Biochemistry at the University of Glasgow in 1975 and, after a soujourn in Glauco Tocchini-Valentini's lab at the Institute of Cell Biology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche in Rome, she undertook a PhD in Molecular Genetics at Imperial College London. During her PhD, she looked at differences in gene expression between differentiated and undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma stem cells, inspiring an early interest in gene expression and cell fate determination. Between 1986 and 1992, Christine undertook three postdoctoral research positions that took her from London back to Scotland, where she was first introduced to mammary gland biology through her work with John Clark at the Roslin Institute in Edinburgh. During her time in the Clark lab, Christine identified a factor - later shown to be STAT5 - that binds to the promoter of the milk protein gene ß-lactoglobulin. This prompted further work identifying the key role played by the STAT family of transcription factors in mammary gland development. Shortly afterwards, Christine became a group leader at the Roslin Institute and later relocated to the University of Edinburgh to collaborate with Andrew Wyllie. This led to her recruitment to the University of Cambridge in 1998, where she has remained to date. Over the last two decades, the Watson lab has focused on elucidating the mechanisms underlying lineage commitment of mammary stem and progenitor cells and the regulation of cell death in involuting mammary gland. In this interview, Christine discusses her research highlights and provides a glimpse into her personal interests, as she moves towards retirement.

Vaishnavi Ananthanarayanan: Advocating for women's representation in science.

Vaishnavi Ananthanarayanan investigates the regulation of motor proteins and cytoskeleton-organelle interactions using single-molecule microscopy.

Editor Profile: Hyunsook Lee.

In this special interview series, we profile members of The FEBS Journal editorial board to highlight their research focus, perspectives on the journal and future directions in their field. Hyunsook Lee is Professor at the Laboratory of Cancer Cell Biology at Seoul National University in Korea. She has served as an editorial board member of The FEBS Journal since 2018.

From integrative structural biology to cell biology.

Integrative modeling is an increasingly important tool in structural biology, providing structures by combining data from varied experimental methods and prior information. As a result, molecular architectures of large, heterogeneous, and dynamic systems, such as the ∼52-MDa Nuclear Pore Complex, can be mapped with useful accuracy, precision, and completeness. Key challenges in improving integrative modeling include expanding model representations, increasing the variety of input data and prior information, quantifying a match between input information and a model in a Bayesian fashion, inventing more efficient structural sampling, as well as developing better model validation, analysis, and visualization. In addition, two community-level challenges in integrative modeling are being addressed under the auspices of the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB). First, the impact of integrative structures is maximized by PDB-Development, a prototype wwPDB repository for archiving, validating, visualizing, and disseminating integrative structures. Second, the scope of structural biology is expanded by linking the wwPDB resource for integrative structures with archives of data that have not been generally used for structure determination but are increasingly important for computing integrative structures, such as data from various types of mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, optical microscopy, proteomics, and genetics. To address the largest of modeling problems, a type of integrative modeling called metamodeling is being developed; metamodeling combines different types of input models as opposed to different types of data to compute an output model. Collectively, these developments will facilitate the structural biology mindset in cell biology and underpin spatiotemporal mapping of the entire cell.

Protistology and Cell Biology at the Marine Arago Laboratory of Banyuls-sur-Mer (1961-2000): Personal Recollections.

The history of protistology and the introduction of modern methods of unicell observations is described in a large maritime laboratory over a period of forty years by the initiator of this new team. The development of this team and the doctoral theses developed there are described as well as the major discoveries made. The Arago Laboratory, which was then in 1960 a field laboratory mainly devoted to the collection of biological material, becomes a research laboratory specializing in the study of the major fundamental problems which govern life: the organization and expression of the genome, mitotic processes and their nuclear and cytoplasmic components, cell cycle and its regulation as well as molecular phylogeny. The biological models chosen were essentially the dinoflagellate protists in their great variety: autotrophs, heterotrophs, myxotrophs and able of proliferating at sea, thus disrupting their cell cycle. Coupled with the techniques of biochemistry and molecular biology which it was in its infancy, the most advanced observation methods used electron and confocal microscopy often after use of ultra-cold cryopreparations, necessary to preserve the antigenic sites and allow the highlighting new proteins. The dinoflagellate model was then abandoned in favor of unicellular micro-eukaryotes allowing the development of environmental genomics.

What makes the cell cycle tick? a celebration of the awesome power of biochemistry and the frog egg.

The cell cycle, a 19th century discovery of cytologists, only achieved a satisfactory biochemical explanation in the last 20 years of the 20th century. This personal retrospective focuses on how biochemical studies of the frog egg helped identify the cyclin-based mitotic oscillator and how this approach quickly merged with genetic studies in yeast to establish the basic mechanism of the eukaryotic cell division cycle. The key feature that made this a cyclic process was regulated protein degradation, mediated by ubiquitin, catalyzed by a massive enzyme machine, called the Anaphase Promoting Complex.

Education, Experience, and Action: An Interview with Dr. Trevor K. Archer.

We asked Dr. Archer about his experiences in academia, struggles he has faced, and thoughts on addressing racial bias. We hope that this series sparks a larger discussion of issues faced by underrepresented scientists and ways the scientific community can foster diversity and better support underrepresented scientists. The opinions expressed here are those of Dr. Archer and not the NIH/NIEHS or the US government.

A Brief History of Phagocytosis.

This chapter outlines some of the more significant steps in our understanding of the phenomenon and mechanism of phagocytosis. These are mainly historical, ranging from near the advent of microscopy in the seventeenth and eighteenth century up to the period before the Second World War (1930s). During this time, science itself moved from being the domain of the wealthy enthusiast to the professional and funded university scientist. Not surprisingly progress was slow of the first two centuries of phagocytic research, but accelerated around the late nineteenth century and the turn of the twentieth century. Since then progress has accelerated still further. This chapter however aims to put our current progress into a historical context and to explore some of the interesting personalities who have set the ground work for our current understanding of the subject of this book, namely phagocytosis.

An appreciation of the prescience of Don Gilbert (1930-2011): master of the theory and experimental unravelling of biochemical and cellular oscillatory dynamics.

We review Don Gilbert's pioneering seminal contributions that both detailed the mathematical principles and the experimental demonstration of several of the key dynamic characteristics of life. Long before it became evident to the wider biochemical community, Gilbert proposed that cellular growth and replication necessitate autodynamic occurrence of cycles of oscillations that initiate, coordinate and terminate the processes of growth, during which all components are duplicated and become spatially re-organised in the progeny. Initiation and suppression of replication exhibit switch-like characteristics, that is, bifurcations in the values of parameters that separate static and autodynamic behaviour. His limit cycle solutions present models developed in a series of papers reported between 1974 and 1984, and these showed that most or even all of the major facets of the cell division cycle could be accommodated. That the cell division cycle may be timed by a multiple of shorter period (ultradian) rhythms, gave further credence to the central importance of oscillatory phenomena and homeodynamics as evident on multiple time scales (seconds to hours). Further application of the concepts inherent in limit cycle operation as hypothesised by Gilbert more than 50 years ago are now validated as being applicable to oscillatory transcript, metabolite and enzyme levels, cellular differentiation, senescence, cancerous states and cell death. Now, we reiterate especially for students and young colleagues, that these early achievements were even more exceptional, as his own lifetime's work on modelling was continued with experimental work in parallel with his predictions of the major current enterprises of biological research.